THE ETERNAL ENIGMA: WHERE DO WHITE PEOPLE COME FROM?
Albino models, they are talented, healthy people who just need extra protection from the sun.
Albino's intermarry, and albinism is highly hereditary.
Albino's often marry other albino's, making more albino's.
Salif Keita
Salif Keita is a world renown artist and an albino.
There is really nothing wrong with albino's, and I do not mean to insult when I speculate they resemble whites, and whites might be a fixed albino nation, a fool proof white nation. Because albino's left Africa and intermarried in georgraphical isolation. This is how white flower seed is produced, by constant interbreeding with white flowers. This is how white horses, birds, fishes, tigers, cats: etc. are cultivated. So why should it be so different for Humans? Is it because whites want to think of themselves as superior over Blacks, while this shows them coming out of Blacks, as Blacks came first? I'm unustly labeled as racist for this deduction that I consider scientific.
This image launched a lot of hostile comments, as it shows a black man on a throne wearing white shoes. There is a source which says: 'The King of France was, on the eve of the French Revolution; presented with a pair of slippers made of human skin.' This is how I dramatised my discovery that there was a trade in human leather till 1848, and I think it was the skins of whites, who were serfs and hardly seen as humans. If we understand the portee of the historical Declaration of Human Rights is rightly understood. I understand from some sources that human races were invented to give these poor whites human status. The idea to give these slippers on the eve of the Revolution, makes to me a connection between the low status of whites and the need for these revolutions. The whites were finally emnacipaten in 1848. Never did I say I agree with those prevailing ideas to perceive whites as shoe leather to the elite, I think the whites were right to fight their oppressors. But I feel this all happened 165 years ago, it was settled: so do we need to go on with the fake, whitened portraits of the brown and black colored European elite (1100-1848)?
Louis XVI did not enjoy his slippers made of human skin for very long,
as he was shorty after that beheaded. The whites were given equality in name only, but the bourgeosie stole the revolution and whites had to face restorations of royal rule, till 1848.
Another showbizz albino, next to the type considered white.
An artist
Snowflake the albino Gorilla. My Ugandian friend tells me there are many more albino gorilla's.
Why do we never get to see them? Like with human albino's we need to see more of them, just to get used to their looks. There is nothing wrong with them. I notice Rogers did not try to speculate about albino's as the source for whiteness, but dutifully repeated the myhts whites tell themselves. I assume he would not only have been ridiculed, but lynches as well. How can somebody look at albino's, talk soberly about some light skinned Blacks who became whites, and tell me they do not remind him of whites. If the wblack gorilla reminds some of some Blacks, why can't Snowflake remind us of some whites too? His sweet smile is alsmost human.
Subject:
The eternal enigma: where do white people come from?
The eternal enigma: where do white people come from?
June 21st, 2013, 6:13 am
The eternal enigma: where do white people come from?
Elsewhere I state that Jane Austen attempts to address this riddle by introducing a white Miss Harriet Smith from unknown origins. As I read parts of Emma (1816) by Austen as non-fiction, I give this JASNA text as a starter, telling you that Emma is very black of complexion, as is Mr. Elton, ‘black, spruce and smiling,’ Mr. Knightley and Mr. Churchill. But for my research blue blood is black blood (1100-1848) I needed to know where whites came from. How did whites evolved out of brown and black complexioned Africans? Most agree that the first humans were Africans, and peopled the world out of East-Africa. When I venture whites look a lot like Albino’s, and they also burn in the sun like Albino’s, some people immediately assume I’m out to insult, as some people believe that an Albino is a sick person. Then I point to some world famous Albino’s who perform at the highest level proofing albinism is not a disease as such. They only need to take care when they venture out in the sun, much like many of us need to take care of what we eat (no milk, no sugar, no gluten, no proteins) but still can function. Next all white live forms come from Albinism; horses, birds, Khoi carpers, flowers: why should it be different for the human animal?
So now can we settle this for once and for all, and kindly offer some sound scientific research, and no hear say or, god forbids, believes.
http://www.jasna.org/persuasions/on-lin ... morris.htm
June 21st, 2013, 6:13 am
The eternal enigma: where do white people come from?
Elsewhere I state that Jane Austen attempts to address this riddle by introducing a white Miss Harriet Smith from unknown origins. As I read parts of Emma (1816) by Austen as non-fiction, I give this JASNA text as a starter, telling you that Emma is very black of complexion, as is Mr. Elton, ‘black, spruce and smiling,’ Mr. Knightley and Mr. Churchill. But for my research blue blood is black blood (1100-1848) I needed to know where whites came from. How did whites evolved out of brown and black complexioned Africans? Most agree that the first humans were Africans, and peopled the world out of East-Africa. When I venture whites look a lot like Albino’s, and they also burn in the sun like Albino’s, some people immediately assume I’m out to insult, as some people believe that an Albino is a sick person. Then I point to some world famous Albino’s who perform at the highest level proofing albinism is not a disease as such. They only need to take care when they venture out in the sun, much like many of us need to take care of what we eat (no milk, no sugar, no gluten, no proteins) but still can function. Next all white live forms come from Albinism; horses, birds, Khoi carpers, flowers: why should it be different for the human animal?
So now can we settle this for once and for all, and kindly offer some sound scientific research, and no hear say or, god forbids, believes.
http://www.jasna.org/persuasions/on-lin ... morris.htm
The eternal enigma: where do white people come from?
Elsewhere I state that Jane Austen attempts to address this riddle by introducing a white Miss Harriet Smith from unknown origins. As I read parts of Emma (1816) by Austen as non-fiction, I give this JASNA text as a starter, telling you that Emma is very black of complexion, as is Mr. Elton, ‘black, spruce and smiling,’ Mr. Knightley and Mr. Churchill. But for my research blue blood is black blood (1100-1848) I needed to know where whites came from. How did whites evolved out of brown and black complexioned Africans? Most agree that the first humans were Africans, and peopled the world out of East-Africa. When I venture whites look a lot like Albino’s, and they also burn in the sun like Albino’s, some people immediately assume I’m out to insult, as some people believe that an Albino is a sick person. Then I point to some world famous Albino’s who perform at the highest level proofing albinism is not a disease as such. They only need to take care when they venture out in the sun, much like many of us need to take care of what we eat (no milk, no sugar, no gluten, no proteins) but still can function. Next all white live forms come from Albinism; horses, birds, Khoi carpers, flowers: why should it be different for the human animal?
So now can we settle this for once and for all, and kindly offer some sound scientific research, and no hear say or, god forbids, believes.
http://www.jasna.org/persuasions/on-lin ... morris.htm
Re:
Nobody looked in on Jane Austen's attempt to understand whites, although she believed Black nobles to be superior over normal Blacks and whites. Off course my research blue blood is black blood (1100-1848) does not register, while I believe in 2015, the whole world will know about the fake, over paints making brown people look white in our museums. Such a blatant thing cannot be or remain a secret. All of history is about Blacks, painting them white does not make them white. So imagine going into any museum in the world and looking at Black faces, and very few white faces in sight. So somehow, because of history, the ability to understand reason, to think rationally, to synthesize information based on sources was knocked out of whites. So you speak to them, give them evidence, and they panic, want to ban you, insult you, and sabotage you. Austen showed Miss Smith to be less intelligent and somewhat nervous and emotional, and I wonder if there is something wrong with whites making it impossible to communicate with them. The ability for humans to be white, to become white is connected with albinism. To Blacks white resemble albino's, some more or less so. To insist there is no connection, is might strange, like yall have some mental defect, not to recognize similar things. But anyway, this read by many people, and I know one or two will get the information, and move with this information. Thank you all for answering, and very little insults or very few slurs to my mental capacities.
I did not mean to sound unkind, I'm grateful for your answer, but surely you do not know my timeagenda, or what I like to accomplish in a day, and it's best if you limit your comments to a statement of mine, then give me a long leisurely essay, not based om some research, which would merit more time to read. I'm not an native english speaker, and I said what I wanted to say without any meanness or so.
Alias wrote:So, I have a new source of anxiety now.
Any minute, somebody's going to come along and scrape the white over-paint off
me. That's got to hurt!
At least the gist of my teachings has not been lost on you. Nobody will hurt you, but we need to stop this nonsense that all started 165 years ago, while whites share equal rights with Blacks since then, and nobody going to turn them into a pair of shoes. The awful Black noble boogey man is gone, will not come back. But the paintings must be restored to their original brown and black colour.
Aonghus wrote:Caucasians represent a genetic
adaptation. Albinism is a genetic disorder. There is a corollory however,
inasmuch as both are characterised by sensitivity to sunlight. This is a
necessary survival mechanism in gloomy, dull environments as pale skin can
absorb more sunlight than dark skin - the sunlight is then converted into
vitamin D.
Adaptation or disorder? If an albino can function, he ain't sick. If he needs a sunblock, a hat and sunglasses, only when going out in the sun, he can function. In my native Suriname, among the Marrons in the jungle: they do not have to work in the sun, so a person will tend his field for him so he can eat, and he can provide some service in return indoors. Nature adapts through albinism. Blacks in a sunless environment still get to go to the beach on a sunny day, and the rest of the year gorge on fatty fish. If the disorder fallacy is out of the way we may look at ice-mummies in Central Asia, looking just like white Europeans, and not like the chinesey folks living there. So Ice mummies is the word to look up.
Why, if living in the same area, do blacks and whites who breed only with their said race continue to be black or white and neither change because of the environment?
Do you understand my research proofing the elite from 1100-1848 was brown and black complexioned? Do you need additional proof? At least I trust that the idea of a brown complexioned Jane Austen (1775-1817) writing about brown and black complexioned gentry does not sicken you, as it does some of our collegeus here.
The Tarim Mummies - An amazing discovery of 2,000 year old mummies in the Tarim basin of Western China occurred in the early 90s. But more amazing than the discovery itself was the astonishing fact that the mummies were blond haired and long nosed.In 1993, Victor Mayer a college professor collected DNA from the mummies and his tests verified that the bodies were all of European genetic stock.Ancient Chinese texts from as early as the first millennium BC do mention groups of far-east dwelling caucasian people referred to as the Bai, Yeuzhi, and Tocharians. None, though, fully reveal how or why these people ended up there.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_TahXQ2WiF0s/S ... ummies.jpg
http://www.visualphotos.com/photo/1x560 ... 0-593A.jpg
I have gained much knowledge by looking a Snowflake the Gorilla, and reading his biography in Google. There are still other albino Gorilla's among the Gorilla's in Africa, yet we never get to see them on the web. As if some people do not want us to see them and thus understand that whites derive from Albinism.
Black children with blond hair. Of interest when an European historical person was described as blond, he/she could still be Black. According to David Mac Ritchie the ancient Europeans resembled the Australians. Among the Roma peoples there are some with black skin and blond hair.
Even the blue eyes are not limited to whites, but came out of Blacks.
The blondness came to the albino's.
So called Ice-mummies, evidence that whites originated in Central Asia.
The so-called beauty of Laulan is a blond woman.
Another Ice-mummie showing an white, fair haired European type.
The whites came to Europe from 6000 years ago, but mainly in 400 AD.
They were considered Barbarians by the brown and black complexioned Greeks, and Romans.
Later they were the serfs and villains who were only liberated in 1848. Then they set ot to whiten the history by over painting all portraits with beige, claiming they had darkened.
This is how Europe became white.
http://diariodebiologia.com/files/2012/ ... 31x431.jpg
THE CLASSICAL AFRICAN IS JUST A FACE TYPE
During my week in Morocco, three city tour I amused myself for hours looking for classical African types. Many Moroccans have full lips, brownish skin, a receding chin and some measure of prognathism and dark curly hair, but you would not call then classical African or Blacks. The color does not seem to be the deciding factor. I found that prognathism together with the wider type of nose to make a person look classical Black. There is a fair skinned, reddish skinned type I call prognathism on legs, dark skinny men, all seem shy to me as if they know they are prognathism on skinny legs. But still you would not call that type Black. Body types is another problem, as people wear clothes. But the large backside among women is really Black. And there is a lot of that, god have mercy. In general they have good fleshy behinds. But there are some women, who have nothing classical African in the face, yet have these lively behinds who move separately from their body. They jiggle in a most alluring way under the silky djellaba. This I have never observed with whites, no matter have full bottomed. So you cannot call Moroccans who are all Berbers: if you ask me, a very mixed nation, whites or Blacks. They also do not resemble true mulattoes, except a handful, who might be a descendant of the two opposite types, one very Black, and one very white parent. Most cannot be defined. And next I find there should be something more than just looks to define a person as Black. Also by having a similar Black partner, having braids or somehow expressing some interest in Blackness. All the billboards and magazine covers show white beauty, and I don’t know if these things are discussed in Morocco. But as they are all so mixed, it would be silly to discriminate, as there will be darker or Black people among your own family. I saw very few true blonds, but they would seldom be mistaken for white Europeans. And I notice some light skinned girls and women using very light make up to appear lighter, and some blonding of their hair. But as a whole they are a very good-looking nation, healthy, expressive, and I tend to use some of their gestures when they speak. There is one dramatic one which looks to me as if they are having a serious business conversation and one is saying: ‘do not blame me' or 'do not sue me afterwards, I do not take responsibility.’ Which is my fantasy off course. They also like to slap hands if you make a slight joke or word play. My research of Jane Austen thought me the Black type was perceived as ‘pure of blood,’ and ‘distinguished’ in looks, and it was used in heraldry as a symbol of blue blood: high nobility. The people of Morocco resemble the types I find on European old master portraits. Also the mix of types, but I guess in Europe the darker skin prevailed, or was cultivated by marrying a darker person. They were the first Europeans who saw whites as just recent immigrants in Europe.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... di_Man.jpg
The Grimaldi Man arrived 45.000 years ago in Europe and the skeleton shows a classical African body/head type.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... di_Man.jpg
The Grimaldi Man arrived 45.000 years ago in Europe and the skeleton shows a classical African body/head type.
Post Number:#33 July 1st, 2013, 5:45 am
DarwinX wrote:Cold weather forces people to think ahead. If you live in the tropics you don't have to think ahead because nature provides everything you need on a daily basis. In cold climates, nature doesn't provide much during the winter period, so only people who think ahead, will survive the winters cold and scarcity of food. This is why white people developed technology before the people in the tropics.
It only seems like that because all the inventors and writers and scientists have been painted beige after 1848. In biographies they are identified as brown and black of complexion. How can I debate the matter if you people keep yourself deaf and blind for my arguments. I would not be saying these things if I did not have any sources, while you come after me with speculations and reader digest wisdom.
THE CLASSICAL AFRICAN IS JUST A FACE TYPE
During my week in Morocco, three city tour I amused myself for hours looking for classical African types. Many Moroccans have full lips, brownish skin, a receding chin and some measure of prognathism and dark curly hair, but you would not call then classical African or Blacks. The color does not seem to be the deciding factor. I found that prognathism together with the wider type of nose to make a person look classical Black. There is a fair skinned, reddish skinned type I call prognathism on legs, dark skinny men, all seem shy to me as if they know they are prognathism on skinny legs. But still you would not call that type Black. Body types is another problem, as people wear clothes. But the large backside among women is really Black. And there is a lot of that, god have mercy. In general they have good fleshy behinds. But there are some women, who have nothing classical African in the face, yet have these lively behinds who move separately from their body. They jiggle in a most alluring way under the silky djellaba. This I have never observed with whites, no matter have full bottomed. So you cannot call Moroccans who are all Berbers: if you ask me, a very mixed nation, whites or Blacks. They also do not resemble true mulattoes, except a handful, who might be a descendant of the two opposite types, one very Black, and one very white parent. Most cannot be defined. And next I find there should be something more than just looks to define a person as Black. Also by having a similar Black partner, having braids or somehow expressing some interest in Blackness. All the billboards and magazine covers show white beauty, and I don’t know if these things are discussed in Morocco. But as they are all so mixed, it would be silly to discriminate, as there will be darker or Black people among your own family. I saw very few true blonds, but they would seldom be mistaken for white Europeans. And I notice some light skinned girls and women using very light make up to appear lighter, and some blonding of their hair. But as a whole they are a very good-looking nation, healthy, expressive, and I tend to use some of their gestures when they speak. There is one dramatic one which looks to me as if they are having a serious business conversation and one is saying: ‘do not blame me' or 'do not sue me afterwards, I do not take responsibility.’ Which is my fantasy off course. They also like to slap hands if you make a slight joke or word play. My research of Jane Austen thought me the Black type was perceived as ‘pure of blood,’ and ‘distinguished’ in looks, and it was used in heraldry as a symbol of blue blood: high nobility. The people of Morocco resemble the types I find on European old master portraits. Also the mix of types, but I guess in Europe the darker skin prevailed, or was cultivated by marrying a darker person. They were the first Europeans who saw whites as just recent immigrants in Europe.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... di_Man.jpg
The Grimaldi Man arrived 45.000 years ago in Europe and the skeleton shows a classical African body/head type.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... di_Man.jpg
The Grimaldi Man arrived 45.000 years ago in Europe and the skeleton shows a classical African body/head type.
Post Number:#33 July 1st, 2013, 5:45 am
DarwinX wrote:Cold weather forces people to think ahead. If you live in the tropics you don't have to think ahead because nature provides everything you need on a daily basis. In cold climates, nature doesn't provide much during the winter period, so only people who think ahead, will survive the winters cold and scarcity of food. This is why white people developed technology before the people in the tropics.
It only seems like that because all the inventors and writers and scientists have been painted beige after 1848. In biographies they are identified as brown and black of complexion. How can I debate the matter if you people keep yourself deaf and blind for my arguments. I would not be saying these things if I did not have any sources, while you come after me with speculations and reader digest wisdom.
The Enigma of Harriet Smith
“OUR PUZZLEMENT OVER HARRIET SMITH begins at the first mention of her. She is introduced as “the natural daughter of somebody,” who years before had placed her at Mrs. Goddard’s school, where her situation is now that of parlour-boarder. And the action of one of the world’s great novels is to turn round the girl pursuing this humble existence: upon her capacity to engage the affections successively of an Elton, a Churchill, a Knightley. The story’s credibility and effectiveness, no less, depends on its sustaining the reader’s impression that she has qualities which can or will overcome her social deficiency. It takes the shock of Harriet’s potential power over Mr. Knightley to awaken Emma to her love for him – and the reality of the distress thus aroused to halt in memorable fashion his proposing to her, in terror lest he should be at the point of confessing an attachment to her protégée. Throughout the novel runs an insistent questioning, whether explicit or unspoken: is Harriet a commendable young woman, a lady in the making – or is she not?”
“OUR PUZZLEMENT OVER HARRIET SMITH begins at the first mention of her. She is introduced as “the natural daughter of somebody,” who years before had placed her at Mrs. Goddard’s school, where her situation is now that of parlour-boarder. And the action of one of the world’s great novels is to turn round the girl pursuing this humble existence: upon her capacity to engage the affections successively of an Elton, a Churchill, a Knightley. The story’s credibility and effectiveness, no less, depends on its sustaining the reader’s impression that she has qualities which can or will overcome her social deficiency. It takes the shock of Harriet’s potential power over Mr. Knightley to awaken Emma to her love for him – and the reality of the distress thus aroused to halt in memorable fashion his proposing to her, in terror lest he should be at the point of confessing an attachment to her protégée. Throughout the novel runs an insistent questioning, whether explicit or unspoken: is Harriet a commendable young woman, a lady in the making – or is she not?”
The link with this source was broken. Reestablish by filling the text back into Google as the article is still there
http://forums.philosophyforums.com...wnerid&search=23234&page=1
Unless there is some scandalous falsehood played on us, Legion has been here since 2008 and was demoted in 2012, after four years of cranking out some fairly good threads. I do not have the time right now to go and read all he offered, but one thread of his about phenotype and genotype sounded sensible. In regard to my blue blood research I found blackness to be spoken of like it’s a serious affliction, some families having a 'strain' of that disease in their bloodline. People not understanding that whites and black can mate freely and have half white half black off spring who are just people, not some mongrel freaks showing deviant behavior. Next I notice some people thinking Blackness in a person’s DNA also leads to certain behaviors, and tells about their morals and academical merits. Even in 2013 with a Black man in the White house or Kofi Annan heading the UN, people have these strange ideas about Blacks and blackness. In The Hague, the royal capital of The Netherlands many provincial hicks come to visit and gawk, but they also show interest in my person to the point of rudeness, as if I came out of space, and they never saw a well-dressed, sophisticated, well spoken, out spoken Black person in real life before. I gather my forbearance and fortitude about me and fearlessly move on. In daily life we deal mostly with phenotype, because this is what we can see, observe, and study. I'm still not convinced by DNA evidence of anything, science has been corrupted after 1848 to show whites as superior beings, while they came out of Blacks. I really do not see how we can alter DNA, no matter how many times it happens in Star Trek. I wish we would not talk about DNA as something we can manage, influence, change or god forbids, make ourselves. I usually tune out when they are talking about DNA. I find the Mendel stuff about sweet peas enlightened enough for normal, everyday life. I'm also not interested in science about living on other planets, a waste of good money to contemplate such nonsense. Suriname is four times the size of Holland, they live just on a small strip of coastal area, they number only 500.000, and the rest is a vast tropical, paradise like jungle. What I would like to see is people coming to us to help us built a new capital like Brasilia, in the middle of this jungle, incorporating all the latest science about city building, durability, sustainability, recycling, and poverty busting politics.
Unless there is some scandalous falsehood played on us, Legion has been here since 2008 and was demoted in 2012, after four years of cranking out some fairly good threads. I do not have the time right now to go and read all he offered, but one thread of his about phenotype and genotype sounded sensible. In regard to my blue blood research I found blackness to be spoken of like it’s a serious affliction, some families having a 'strain' of that disease in their bloodline. People not understanding that whites and black can mate freely and have half white half black off spring who are just people, not some mongrel freaks showing deviant behavior. Next I notice some people thinking Blackness in a person’s DNA also leads to certain behaviors, and tells about their morals and academical merits. Even in 2013 with a Black man in the White house or Kofi Annan heading the UN, people have these strange ideas about Blacks and blackness. In The Hague, the royal capital of The Netherlands many provincial hicks come to visit and gawk, but they also show interest in my person to the point of rudeness, as if I came out of space, and they never saw a well-dressed, sophisticated, well spoken, out spoken Black person in real life before. I gather my forbearance and fortitude about me and fearlessly move on. In daily life we deal mostly with phenotype, because this is what we can see, observe, and study. I'm still not convinced by DNA evidence of anything, science has been corrupted after 1848 to show whites as superior beings, while they came out of Blacks. I really do not see how we can alter DNA, no matter how many times it happens in Star Trek. I wish we would not talk about DNA as something we can manage, influence, change or god forbids, make ourselves. I usually tune out when they are talking about DNA. I find the Mendel stuff about sweet peas enlightened enough for normal, everyday life. I'm also not interested in science about living on other planets, a waste of good money to contemplate such nonsense. Suriname is four times the size of Holland, they live just on a small strip of coastal area, they number only 500.000, and the rest is a vast tropical, paradise like jungle. What I would like to see is people coming to us to help us built a new capital like Brasilia, in the middle of this jungle, incorporating all the latest science about city building, durability, sustainability, recycling, and poverty busting politics.
ALEXANDER THE GREAT BY APELLES: SWARTHY
Albino by Benjamin Constant
Is it an over paint or did he make it like that?
as it's of little importance.
JA Rogers shows what all these Asian nations often look like,
quite Black, and Chinese are prognastic and thick lipped,
as are many south Asians and Indonesians.
The Pacific islanders are clearly classical African in looks with some admixture,
while a black skinned person can never be called a white,
as no white will accept him as white.
Ethiopians and Somalis in the US are seen as Blacks, not Caucasian in spite of narrow lips,
noses and straight hair.
The first humans were East Africans,
The first humans made all the important discoveries and travels and built the pyramids.
If whites are weaker than its because they cannot stand the sun so well,
the whites that left Africa were albino's as a group that settled in Central Asia where
there are the ice mummies. We need to incorporate the Ice mummies in the story.
But most importantly is that white is a social construct, invented to free whites who were shoe leather till 1848.
White skinned people who are not Europeans do not share the organized hatred of Blacks
as they were not ruled and oppressed till recently, 1848, as white Europeans were.
Racism against Blacks is a liberation ideology.
So from 1848 history was revised, and all writing about races was to hide the brown and black domination of Europe in retrospect.
Like the story of 9/11 we all witnessed is told in horrible fake way by the US government,
this is how we are kept from the true history of Blacks dominating Europe.
My blue blood theory
Today we have slavery of Polish Catholics in Holland by their fellow white Dutch.
There is nothing unusual of whites enslaving whites or Blacks enslaving blacks.
It's for profit. Some people would sell their own mother...
Even some former Black slaves would become slave masters.
There were Africans who traveled between Africa and the Americas
to monitor their slave trade. They were never enslaved themselves.
The brown and black European elite enslaved Africans they saw as heathens,
and slavery would teach them Christianity and civilization.
This was stated many times. So simplistic to equate color, looks with behavior.
A lot
of beliefs by whites about their origins are based on very shaky so-called
scientific research.
Most is fantasy after 1848 when whites were finally accepted as humans.
They felt a need to create a history of themselves,
and started to falsify antiquities to make the Egyptian civilization white,
they stripped antiquities from their outer brown or black paint layer
and created new antiquities of white pharaohs with blue eyes.
Today this can all be put within a context,
by the blue blood theory, and that whites have over painted
all portraits of the brown and black European noble and bourgeois elite,
to make them look white. Shoeleather became civilizers to the world,
I'll say...
Most is fantasy after 1848 when whites were finally accepted as humans.
They felt a need to create a history of themselves,
and started to falsify antiquities to make the Egyptian civilization white,
they stripped antiquities from their outer brown or black paint layer
and created new antiquities of white pharaohs with blue eyes.
Today this can all be put within a context,
by the blue blood theory, and that whites have over painted
all portraits of the brown and black European noble and bourgeois elite,
to make them look white. Shoeleather became civilizers to the world,
I'll say...
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten